This article critiques traditional social media platforms for prioritizing superficial engagement over meaningful discourse, particularly frustrating "Cultural Creatives"—individuals focused on addressing complex global challenges like climate change and social justice. The piece argues that current platforms create echo chambers, reward sensationalism over constructive debate, and reduce complex problems to oversimplified soundbites through their "one-to-many" model and algorithm-driven feeds. It identifies growing demand for "prosocial media" alternatives that emphasize collective sensemaking, systems thinking, and context-rich discussions rather than individual popularity metrics. The article contrasts traditional social networks' focus on likes, shares, and brief comments with the need for platforms that support in-depth analysis, multidimensional understanding, and collaborative knowledge-building to tackle "wicked problems" requiring nuanced, interconnected thinking.

This article describes SparkMaps as Hunome's visual tool for representing collective understanding and diverse viewpoints on specific themes or subjects. The platform aims to help groups see the breadth of their collective knowledge, reach shared understanding, and make better decisions based on that understanding. SparkMaps begin with an initial thought or idea that expands through collaborative contributions, covering themes like cultural adjustment, curiosity, AI limitations, future of work, misinformation, demographic shifts, universal basic income, and EU energy policy. The article outlines methods for using online meetings to build SparkMaps collectively, including starting with personal stories, reflecting on contributions, identifying knowledge gaps, and scheduling follow-up sessions for continued development. It mentions positive feedback from organizations like Systems Change Finland and Friends of Curiosity regarding the tool's effectiveness for discovering new connections and insights.

This article defines "humanity explorers" as individuals from diverse backgrounds who share a curiosity about human behavior and societal systems. The piece describes three key characteristics: they come from various professional and personal contexts (designers, marketers, strategists, or simply curious individuals), with estimates citing 1 billion knowledge workers and up to 50% of adults in high-income societies as "cultural creatives"; they possess empathy and insight, leading to broader worldviews and creative problem-solving abilities; and they reject simplistic black-and-white thinking, instead seeking nuance and multiple perspectives to build comprehensive understanding. The article claims these individuals tend to make more sustainable decisions by considering various viewpoints and seeing themselves as part of larger systems rather than focusing solely on individual concerns. The piece positions humanity explorers as naturally inclined toward collective thinking and human-aware decision-making approaches.

This article presents Hunome's approach to building multidimensional understanding of human-related themes through collective perspectives. The piece argues that everyone is qualified to contribute to understanding humanity since all people have lived human experiences, whether simple daily activities or complex expertise in fields like anthropology or social psychology. Using recreational space use as an example, it describes how different stakeholders (designers, town planners, community fitness group members) can contribute varied perspectives that collectively build comprehensive understanding of topics. The article outlines three levels of understanding: individual (connecting personal thoughts with broader perspectives), shared (developing collective insights about human experiences), and impact-oriented (using multidimensional understanding to make more human-aware decisions in personal choices and product/service design). The piece positions this collective sensemaking approach as a way to improve perceptions and decision-making by making comprehensive human understanding accessible to everyone.

This article examines how polarization and information disparity have created a "black or white world" lacking nuance in public discourse, using examples like the US presidential race and Black Lives Matter movement. The piece attributes this polarization partly to social media advertising models that create echo chambers by showing users content similar to what they've previously engaged with, designed to benefit advertisers rather than promote diverse thinking. The author argues that this segmentation hinders problem-solving for complex "wicked problems" like educational access inequality, which require systems thinking and multiple perspectives to address effectively. The article also identifies information silos as a barrier, noting that comprehensive understanding requires time and resources to gather fragmented information from various sources, creating disparities between those who can access broad perspectives and those who cannot. The piece advocates for embracing diverse viewpoints and bringing people together around complex issues rather than treating differences as divisive badges.